Methodological Issues Psychology Research Papers

ological issues pertaining to research involving children with autistic spectrum disorders, including information useful for describing samples; the benefits and practical problems of using randomized, clinical trial research design and the movement toward treatment comparison and aptitude-by-treatment interactions; the relative benefits and limitations of single-subject research methodology; assessing fidelity of treatment; potential use of current methodologies for modeling developmental growth of children and factors affecting growth; and group size.


There are several distinct, substantial, and independent bodies of research addressing issues concerning young children with autistic spectrum disorders. One basic body of literature describes and attempts to explain the neurological (Minshew et al., 1997), behavioral (Sigman and Ruskin, 1999), and developmental (Wetherby and Prutting, 1984) characteristics of children with autistic spectrum disorders. A second body of research has addressed issues related to diagnosis, particularly early diagnosis, of autism (Lord, 1997) and the related issue of prevalence (Fombonne, 1999). A third body of literature has examined the effects of comprehensive treatment programs on the immediate and long-term outcomes for young children with autistic spectrum disorders and their families (e.g., Harris et al., 1991; McEachin et al., 1993; Rogers and DiLalla, 1991; Strain and Hoyson, 2000). A fourth body of research has addressed individual instructional or intervention approaches that focus on specific aspects of a child’s behavior, such as social skills (McConnell, 1999), language and communication (Goldstein, 1999), or problem behavior (Horner et al., 2000). These four bodies of literature have different primary purposes (and research questions), conceptual and theoretical frames of reference, and research methodologies. However, these research literatures all have the potential of informing the design, content, and evaluation of intervention procedures.

Similarly, funding for autism intervention and educational research has also come from a number of federal institutes with separate, but overlapping missions. These include the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) in the U.S. Department of Education and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. More recently, parent-initiated, nonprofit agencies such as Autism Society of America Foundation, Cure Autism Now (CAN), and the National Alliance for Autism Research (NAAR) have had an increasing role in supporting and instigating research.

  • Douglas, S.P. and Craig, C.S. (2006) On improving the conceptual foundations of international marketing research. Journal of International Marketing 14 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR). (2011) Global Market Research 2011. ESOMAR Industry Report. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: ESOMAR.Google Scholar

  • Usunier, J.C. and Lee, J.A. (2009) Marketing Across Cultures, 5th edn. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

  • Survey Research Center. (2011) Guidelines for Best Practice in Cross-Cultural Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan., accessed 1 May 2012.

  • Aulakh, P.S. and Kotabe, M. (1993) An assessment of theoretical and methodological development in international marketing: 1980-1990. Journal of International Marketing 1 (2): 5–28.Google Scholar

  • Samiee, S. and Athanassiou, N. (1998) International strategy research: Cross-cultural Methodology implications. Journal of Business Research 43 (2): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Samiee, S. and Jeong, I. (1994) Cross-cultural research in advertising: An assessment of methodologies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (3): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Sin, L.Y.M., Cheung, G.W.M. and Lee, R. (1999) Methodology in cross-cultural consumer research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 11 (4): 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Sin, L.Y.M., Hung, K. and Cheung, G.W.M. (2001) An assessment of methodological development in cross-cultural advertising research: A twenty-year review in cross-cultural consumer research: a review and critical assessment. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 14 (2/3): 153–192.Google Scholar

  • Cavusgil, S.T., Deligonul, S. and Yaprak, A. (2005) International marketing as a field of study: A critical assessment of earlier development and a look forward. Journal of International Marketing 13 (4): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • He, Y., Merz, M.A. and Alden, D.L. (2008) Diffusion of measurement invariance assessment in cross-national empirical marketing research: Perspectives from the literature and survey of researchers. Journal of International Marketing 16 (2): 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hult, G.T.M. et al (2008) Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: Assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies 39 (6): 1027–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Herk, H., Poortinga, Y.H. and Verhallen, T.M.M. (2005) Equivalence of survey data: Relevance for international marketing. European Journal of Marketing 39 (3/4): 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Engelen, A. and Brettel, M. (2011a) Assessing cross-cultural marketing theory and research. Journal of Business Research 64 (5): 516–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kumar, V. (2009) Researching international markets: Philosophical and methodological issues. In: M. Kotabe and K. Helsen (eds.) The SAGE Book of International Marketing. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Sekaran, U. (1983) Methodological and theoretical issues and advancements in cross-cultural research. Journal of International of Business Studies 12 (2): 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Malhotra, N.K., Peterson, M. and Kleiser, S.B. (1996) Marketing research: A state-of-the-art review and directions for the twenty-first century. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (2): 160–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Malhotra, N.K. (2010) Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Global Edition, 6th edn. London: Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar

  • Craig, C.S. and Douglas, S.P. (2005) International Marketing Research, 3rd edn. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Adler, N.J. (1983) A typology of management studies involving culture. Journal of International Business Studies 14 (2): 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Douglas, S.P. and Craig, C.S. (1997) The changing dynamic of consumer behavior: Implications for cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research in Marketing 14 (4): 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Craig, C.S. and Douglas, S.P. (2006) Beyond national culture: Implications of cultural dynamics for consumer research. International Marketing Review 23 (3): 322–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Craig, C.S. and Douglas, S.P. (2010) Assessing cross-cultural marketing theory and research: A commentary essay. Journal of Business Research 64 (6): 625–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Engelen, A. and Brettel, M. (2011b) Assessing cross-cultural marketing theory and research: Reply to Craig and Douglas’ commentary. Journal of Business Research 64 (7): 782–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, J., Beatty, S.E. and Walsh, G. (2008) Review and future directions of cross-cultural consumer services research. Journal of Business Research 61 (3): 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, J.W. (1969) On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology 4 (2): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hui, C.H. and Triandis, H.C. (1985) Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 16 (2): 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, J.W. (1989) Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology 24 (2): 721–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaffer, B.S. and Riordan, C.M. (2003) A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods 6 (2): 169–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Polsa, P. (2011) The crossover-dialog approach: The importance of multiple methods for international business. Journal of Business Research, doi: Scholar

  • De Jong, M.G., Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. and Veldkamp, B.P. (2009) A model for the construction of country-specific yet internationally comparable short-form marketing scales. Marketing Science 28 (4): 674–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Cavusgil, S.T. and Das, A. (1997) Methodological issues in empirical cross-cultural research: A survey of the management literature and a framework. Management International Review 37 (1): 71–96.Google Scholar

  • Nasif, E.G., Al-Daeaj, H., Ebrahimi, B. and Thibodeaux, M.S. (1991) Methodological problems in cross-cultural research: An updated review. Management International Review 31 (1): 79–91.Google Scholar

  • Contractor, S.H. and Fox, R.J. (2011) An investigation of the relationship between the number of response categories and scale sensitivity. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 19 (1): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Roster, C., Albaum, G. and Rogers, R. (2006) Can cross-national/cultural studies presume etic equivalency in respondents’ use of extreme categories of Likert rating scales? International Journal of Market Research 48 (6): 741–759.Google Scholar

  • Brislin, R.W. (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1 (3): 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Douglas, S.P. and Craig, C.S. (2007) Collaborative and iterative translation: An alternative approach to back translation. Journal of International Marketing 15 (1): 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Reynolds, N.L., Simintiras, A.C. and Diamantopoulos, A. (2003) Theoretical justification of sampling choices in International Marketing Research: Key issues and guidelines for researchers. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (1): 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Green, R.T. and White, P.D. (1976) Methodological considerations in cross-national consumer research. Journal of International Business Studies 7 (2): 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bhalla, G. and Lin, L. (1987) Cross-cultural marketing research: A discussion of equivalence issues and measurement strategies. Psychology and Marketing 4 (4): 275–285.Google Scholar

  • Mullen, M.R. (1995) Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (3): 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Poortinga, Y.H. (1989) Equivalence of cross-cultural data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology 24 (1): 737–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Singh, J. (1995) Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies 26 (3): 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Douglas, S.P. and Craig, C.S. (1983) International Marketing Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • 0 thoughts on “Methodological Issues Psychology Research Papers”


    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *